|
Staff
Analysis:
Staff and the appropriate referral agencies have reviewed
this request for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance, and other relevant policies and
regulations. Staff and referral agency findings, comments,
and recommendations transmitted to the Planning Commission
are included as Attachment 3. No new comments have been
received. The issues have been resolved with any exceptions
noted in the Summary and Recommendations section herein.
Summary and Recommendations:
Staff
recommends that the Board of Supervisors consider the
Planning Commission’s recommendation of approval for these
items as well as the specified condition. This proposal
changes the number of beds from 40 to 72-bed (with no more
than 60 units total) and the building size for the assisted
living facility to accommodate a building up to 54,200
square feet.
At the time
of preparation of this report, staff, the applicant, its
representative and Supervisor Downey have a meeting
scheduled to discuss the Special Exception conditions. It
is possible that additional conditions or refinements to the
conditions may occur subsequent to preparation of the
report. If that is the case, the most current version will
be added to this report as an additional attachment.
VDH staff
has renewed the permit for the waste water treatment plant.
In addition, VDH and Community Development staff have
reviewed and refined the Special Exception condition
language regarding maintenance and monitoring to ensure
compliance with VDH permit regulations.
The current
submittal reflects staff’s request for additional
bond/letter of credit funds as incentive to complete the
assisted living facility. The proposed conditions condition
also provides a mechanism, to reduce the bond.
Staff notes
that although the “Continuing Care Facility” is no longer
allowed in the RA/Rural Agricultural District it is still
possible to allow the requested increase in the use under
the provisions of Zoning Ordinance Section 5-004(2). This
referenced section allows the Board of Supervisors to
“specifically waive or modify requirements for obtaining
additional permits for the enlarging, extending, increasing
in intensity or relocation of previously approved Special
Exception uses in unusual cases when the change is not
significant.” This standard has been achieved and is
reflected in the resolution. Such a waiver or modification
is necessary in this case or the amendment request cannot be
approved without a text amendment. The Special Exception
amendment is also required since it specifically addressed
the number of beds and that is the focus of the facility’s
expansion.
The
building design has incorporated aesthetics (blending in
with the Suffield Meadow residential development) and
addressed the size and screening of the proposed assisted
living facility and to minimize impact as viewed from Route
29. Although parking and loading will be screened, since
they have been located to the “rear” of the building, which
actually faces Route 29, they may still be visually
prominent. The Board of Supervisors may wish to consider
additional screening requirements. Staff also notes the
maximum height in the district is 35 feet; it was not
possible to measure the proposed building’s height since no
scale was provided with the plan.
|