AGENDA REQUEST
|
Sponsor:
|
Board of Supervisors Meeting Date:
|
|
Planning Commission
|
April 13, 2006 |
Staff Lead:
|
Department: |
|
W. Todd Benson, Assistant Zoning
Administrator
|
Community Development |
Topic:
|
|
A Zoning
Ordinance Text Amendment to Section 13-406 to Grant
Exemptions to Minimum Lot Width, Minimum Lot Frontage,
Minimum Setback Requirements, and Certain Residential Height
Requirements, to Delete Certain Variance Authority Delegated
to the Zoning Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals,
and to Amend Sections 2-413, 2-505, and 3‑324 for
Consistency with these Changes
|
|
Topic
Description:
|
|
Fauquier County Zoning Ordinance Section 13-406 allows the
Board of Zoning Appeals and the Zoning Administrator to
grant certain variances based upon mistake. This amendment
eliminates those classes of variance and substitutes an
“exemption” authority with the Zoning Administrator. |
|
Requested Action of the Board of Supervisors: |
|
Consider adoption of the
attached Ordinance. |
|
Financial Impact Analysis: |
|
No financial impact analysis has been conducted.
|
|
Summary
Staff Report: |
|
At present, the Zoning Ordinance permits the Zoning
Administrator and the Board of Zoning Appeals to grant
variances to the minimum yard requirements in the case of
any building existing or partially constructed which did not
comply with such requirements applicable at the time such
building was erected. Statutory authority for such
variances has always been questionable; the door was closed
on such variances when the Virginia Supreme Court decided
Cochran v. Fairfax County Board of Zoning Appeals in
July 2004. In that opinion, the Virginia Supreme Court
emphasized that the General Assembly intended that variances
be granted only in cases where application of zoning
restrictions would appear to be constitutionally
impermissible.
The General Assembly responded by amending the Virginia Code
to allow Zoning Administrators to grant exemptions under
standards different than the traditional variance standards.
This amendment would remove from the Fauquier County Zoning
Ordinance the variance authority based upon mistake. It
would then vest in the Zoning Administrator authority to
grant exemptions from any provision contained in the Zoning
Ordinance with respect to minimum lot width, minimum lot
frontage, and minimum setback requirements, with the written
finding that: (a) the strict application of the ordinance
would produce undue hardship; (b) such hardship is not
shared generally by other properties in the same zoning
district and the same vicinity; and (c) the authorization of
the modification will not be of substantial detriment to
adjacent property and the character of the zoning district
will not be changed by the granting of the modification.
The Board of Zoning Appeals would retain its traditional
authority for processing other variances.
This
proposed text amendment was initiated by the Planning
Commission on December 7, 2005. The Planning Commission
recommended adoption of this Ordinance on January 26, 2006.
After the close of the public hearing on March 9, 2006,
Chairman Graham requested a work session on the proposed
amendment. A work session was conducted on April 13, 2006. |
Identify any other Departments, Organizations or
Individuals that would be affected by this request:
|
Department of Economic Development
Attachment:
Proposed Text Amendment |
ORDINANCE
A ZONING
ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT TO SECTION 13-406 TO GRANT EXEMPTIONS TO
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH, MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE, MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS,
AND CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS, TO DELETE CERTAIN VARIANCE
AUTHORITY DELEGATED TO THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND THE BOARD OF ZONING
APPEALS, AND TO AMEND SECTIONS 2-413, 2-505, AND 3-324 FOR CONSISTENCY
WITH THESE CHANGES
WHEREAS, on December 7, 2005, the Planning Commission initiated this
text amendment; and
WHEREAS, on January 26, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this issue and forwarded the proposed text amendment to the
Board of Supervisors recommending its adoption; and
WHEREAS, on March 9, 2006, the Fauquier County Board of Supervisors held
a public hearing on this amendment; and
WHEREAS,
the adoption of this text amendment would be in the spirit of the Zoning
Ordinance, consistent with public convenience, general welfare, and good
zoning practices, consistent with the adopted Comprehensive Plan, and is
in the best interest of the citizens of Fauquier County; now, therefore,
be it
ORDAINED by the Fauquier County Board of Supervisors this 13th
day of April 2006, That Sections 13-406, 2-413, 2-505, and 3-324 of the
Fauquier County Zoning Ordinance be, and are hereby, amended as follows:
13-406 Variance
of Minimum Yard Requirements Based on Error in
Location of
Buildings
1. Notwithstanding
the other provisions of this Part, the Zoning
Administrator and
the BZA shall have the authority, as qualified
below, to grant a
variance to the minimum yard requirements in the
case of any
building existing or partially constructed which did not
comply with such
requirements applicable at the time such building
was erected. Such a
variance may be granted if and only if:
A. It
is established that such noncompliance was through no fault of
the applicant or
was the result of an error in the location of the
building subsequent
to the issuance of the Building Permit, and
B. Such
variance will not impair the purpose and intent of this
Ordinance, and
C. It
will not be detrimental to the use and enjoyment of other
property in the
immediate vicinity, and
D. It
will not create an unsafe condition with respect to other
property and/or
public streets, and
E. To
force compliance with the minimum yard requirements would
ause unreasonable
hardship upon the owner.
2. Such a variance
may be granted:
A. By
the Zoning Administrator if the error does not exceed ten
(10) percent of the
measurement that is involved.
B. By
the BZA if the error is greater than ten (10) percent of the
measurement that is
involved.
3. In granting such
a variance under the provisions of this Section, the
Zoning
Administrator and the BZA may prescribe such conditions as
deemed advisable to
assure compliance with the intent of this Part.
4. Upon the
granting of a variance for a particular building in
accordance with the
provisions of this Section, the same shall be
deemed to be a
lawful building.
5. The Zoning
Administrator or the BZA shall have no power to vary
the application of
any of the limitations specified in this Ordinance.
13-406 Authority of Zoning Administrator to Grant Exemptions
1. The
Zoning Administrator is authorized to grant a modification from any
provision contained in the Zoning Ordinance with respect to minimum
lot width, minimum lot frontage, minimum setback requirements, and,
in RA and RC Districts, height
requirements for single family houses up to ten feet, provided extra
living space is not added,
physical requirements on a lot or parcel of land, including but not
limited to size, height, location or features of or related to any
building, structure, or improvements if the Zoning
Administrator finds in writing that: (a) the strict application of the
ordinance would produce undue hardship; (b) such hardship is not shared
generally by other properties in the same zoning district and the same
vicinity; and (c) the authorization of the modification will not be of
substantial detriment to adjacent property and the character of the
zoning district will not be changed by the granting of the modification.
2.
Prior to the granting of a modification, the Zoning Administrator shall
give, or require the applicant to give, all adjoining property owners
written notice of the request for modification, and an opportunity to
respond to the request within 21 days of the date of the notice. The
Zoning Administrator shall make a decision on the application for
modification and issue a written decision, within 90 days of a request
for a decision or determination on zoning matters within the scope of
his authority unless the requester has agreed to a longer period, with a
copy provided to the applicant and any adjoining landowner who responded
in writing to the notice sent pursuant to this subsection.
3.
The decision of the Zoning Administrator shall constitute a decision
within the purview of Virginia Code §
15.2-2311, and may be appealed to the Board of Zoning Appeals.
2-413 Reduction in
Front Yard Requirements
With respect to the
one (1) or more lots lying between other lots (a) in the same block, and
(b) within a distance of 600 feet on each side, and (c) there are
existing buildings on the other lots with front yards less than the
front yard required for the district, the BZA Zoning
Administrator may grant a variance exemption under the
provisions procedures of Part 4 of Article 13 authorizing the
erection of buildings on such intervening lots with such front yard(s)
as will, in the opinion of the BZA Zoning Administrator
produce the most satisfactory overall design of the development and the
most appropriate manner of use of the land that is involved; provided
that no front yard shall be authorized hereunder that is less than the
front yard of the nearest of such existing buildings.
2-505 Use
Limitations on Corner Lots
1. On
every corner lot within the triangle formed by the street lines of such
lot and line drawn between points on such lines which are thirty (30)
feet from the intersection thereof, there shall be no structure or
planting of such nature and dimensions as to obstruct lateral vision
other than a point, column or trunk or tree, (but not branches or
foliage) which is not greater than one (1) foot in cross section or
diameter. Such lateral vision shall be maintained between two (2)
horizontal planes, one of which is three and one-half (3 1/2) feet, and
the other ten (10) feet above the average elevation of the existing
surface of either street at the center line thereof.
2.
Since the purpose of this provision is to promote public safety by
preserving reasonable sight distance for vehicular traffic at street
intersections, the BZA Zoning Administrator may vary the
specified requirements in accordance with the provisions
procedures of Part 4 of Article 13 in those instances where
structures or plantings between the two (2) horizontal planes do not in
fact interfere with sight distance.
|
See Page
III-4 for Key |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SITE |
RC |
RA |
RR-2 |
V |
R-1 |
R-2 |
R-3 |
R-4 |
TH |
GA |
MDP |
C-1 |
C-2 |
C-3 |
CV |
I-1 |
I-2 |
|
|
PLAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-324
INCREASES IN BUILDING |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEIGHT (CATEGORY 24) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
SP |
|
|
|
A* |
A* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Refer to Article 13, Section 13-406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|