|
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA
REQUEST Owner/Applicant:
Board of Supervisors Meeting Date: Russell and Mary Culver
Staff
Lead:
Department: Chuck A. Floyd Community Development Magisterial
District:
PIN: Scott 7916-02-8771-000 Service
District: Topic:
A Resolution to Waive
Zoning Ordinance Section 7-302.1.B to Allow a Property Location:
The property is located on
the west side of Topic Description: The
applicants are seeking a waiver of Zoning Ordinance Section 7-302.1.B,
Limitations, which would allow a subdivision on a private street that does
not connect directly to a state maintained street.
As proposed, the new twenty-foot easement would connect to another
private street rather than the required direct connection.
The applicants have submitted a family transfer division
application to divide a 5-acre parcel into three (3) lots to create
parcels for their two sons. As
proposed, the family transfer lots would be accessed via The
property is zoned R-1 (Residential). The
subject property has the subdivision potential to be divided into four (4)
lots. The property is located
on the west side of Attachment
1 and 2 provide location maps for the subject parcel in relation to the
County and Requested Action of the Board of Supervisors: Consider
adoption of the attached resolution. Planning
Commission Recommendation: On 1. No other access appears to be feasible; 2. The family transfers would not be permitted without the waiver; and 3.
The traffic impact from the proposed two (2) additional
dwellings will be of minimal impact to the existing property owners
utilizing Financial
Impact Analysis: No fiscal impact analysis was
required with this request. Other
Departments, Organizations or Individuals affected by this request: Property owners along Staff
Analysis: Section 7-302.1.B of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a private street connect directly to a state maintained street. However, the Board of Supervisors has the authority to modify this limitation provided the applicant can show that: 1. No other remedy is realistically feasible; 2. Plausible alternatives have been exhausted; 3. To not so modify the applicable limitation would place an unreasonable restriction on the use of the property; and 4. Properties through which access is planned will not be unreasonably affected. No other access options are available, as the applicants’ lot is internal to the development. Without the requested waiver, the applicant cannot proceed with the proposed family transfer divisions as the road frontage and access requirements cannot be met. The existing Road Maintenance Association has agreed to include the proposed lots in the Association. Twelve (12)
addressable structures, presumably homes, are located on Attachments: 1.
|