|
Staff
Analysis:
Staff and the appropriate referral agencies have reviewed
this request for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance, and other relevant policies and
regulations. Staff and referral agency findings, comments,
and recommendations are summarized below. The actual
responses from referral agencies are included as
attachments.
The Fauquier County Water and Sanitation Authority (WSA)
proposes to locate a water storage facility on Stephenson
Hill (per local historian Eugene Scheel), or otherwise known
as Cannon Ridge, in the south-west quadrant of Marshall.
This small hill was identified in the Marshall Citizen
Committee VISION exercise as an important cultural and
environmental resource to the community, and had a military
significance associated with the Civil War. Accordingly,
the Marshal Service District Comprehensive Plan identifies
Stephenson Hill as a preserved area, and such was given
consideration during recent subdivision approval of this
parcel. Given the importance of Stephenson Hill/Cannon
Ridge to the community, any public facility proposed to be
located in this area should be given particular scrutiny to
this regard and, if located, the facility should be very
unobtrusive.
Zoning and Land Use
The property is currently zoned
Residential (R-2). Consistent with this zoning category,
this property is located in a district that contains similar
zoning and parcels, which are also within the Service
District. The property is bound on 3 sides by parcels that
are zoned Residential (R-4) and on one side is Rural
Agricultural (RA).
Zoning
1.
A Major Site Plan consistent with Article 12 of the
Fauquier County Zoning Ordinance and all applicable
conditions set forth in the Special Exception must be
submitted for approval prior to obtaining building and
zoning permits.
2.
This application cannot be approved unless a Special
Exception to reduce the required open space for the Cannon
Ridge Subdivision is first approved by the Board. The
Cannon Ridge Subdivision has an existing Special Exception
which reduced their open space requirement from 50% to 44%,
and because this proposed tower further reduces the open
space, another Special Exception approval is required.
Section 2-309 specifically prohibits credit being given for
open space for this type of public facility.
Soils/Environmental
After
reviewing the above stated Special Exception application the
following comment is made:
Soils in proposed areas appear to be generally suitable.
However, shallow rock may be encountered requiring the use
of specialty equipment to dig footers.
Virginia
Department of Transportation
Summary of
VDOT comments:
The Warrenton Residency staff
reviewed the above referenced Special Exception for the
installation of a water storage silo, and note that the
entrance to the water silo may need to be combined with one
of the driveway entrances on Overlook Drive, because it
appears as if there is no separation between the driveways
on the cul-de-sac.
Summary and Recommendations:
Staff is
not in support of this Special Exception and recommends a
resolution to deny the request. Also note that this
application is directly linked to a Special Exception
amendment request for a further reduction in open space to
accommodate the water storage silo (SPEX03-MA-016).
Consideration of approval for this Special Exception first
requires the approval of the open space reduction Special
Exception Amendment or it cannot proceed. At its April 29,
2004 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended denial of
the open space reduction.
Since the
two Special Exceptions are linked, it is suggested that they
are treated in the same regard. Additionally, staff asks
the Board to take into consideration the historical
significance of this site and the sensitivity of the
proposed location. The proposed location sits upon the
highest point in Marshall, as well as one of historic
significance. It is an area that, albeit privately owned,
is of great importance to community residents. If the Board
should decide to approve the aforementioned request, staff
recommends maintaining the original conditions and
resolution, with the addition of the amendment to the text,
to reflect the change in open space (0.63 percent), and a
reduction to 43% versus the required 50% or the formerly
approved reduction of 44%. |