|
Staff
Analysis:
Staff and the appropriate referral agencies have reviewed
this request for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance, and other relevant policies and
regulations. Staff and referral agency findings, comments,
and recommendations are summarized below. The actual
responses from referral agencies are included as
attachments.
Engineering
Considerations
The
Engineering Division has reviewed the above referenced plan
and has provided the following comments:
1.
This dam appears to be in excess of 25’ tall and
therefore falls under the jurisdiction of the State. Provide
a copy of the Operation and Maintenance Certificate issued
by the Virginia Soils and Water Board. Installing the road
just below the dam may also change the dam classification
which may require upgrades. Contact Dianna Sheesley, P.E.
(540) 351-1587, from the Department of Conservation and
Recreation for more information.
The
Applicant is working with Dianna Sheesley of DCR and
submitted the required application to DCR for review on
April 21, 2004.
Summary and Recommendations:
Staff
recommends that the Board of Supervisors either postpone
action, through the consent of the Applicant or deny the
proposal since the Applicant has not provided any
documentation of response from DCR regarding their
application for dam status or information on any required
repairs. The Applicant must provide the DCR Operation and
Maintenance schedule to staff along with their proposed
method and timeframe for repairs. These conditions (from
DCR) will be a requirement of approval for the Special
Exception. Additionally, the DCR certification is not valid
until the conditions of approval (from DCR) are met.
Generally applicants have two years to complete the required
repairs.
Staff has
spoken with DCR and noted that there are several items
associated with the dam that will require repair. There was
observed seepage at the toe of the slope and all of the
trees on the dam need to be removed. A pavilion is within
the emergency spillway and must be removed. The new
proposed floodplain crossing (road) is too close to the
spillway and any repairs or re-grading of the dam slope may
also shift the road. These modifications will likely effect
the location of the road and staff cannot adequately
evaluate the proposal without more information from the
Applicant. Staff has spoken with the Applicant to urge them
to prepare for this agenda item, but the Applicant has not
provided a response.
|