|
Topic Description:
The
applicant wishes to rezone approximately 55.56 acres (44.35
and 11.20 respectively) from Rural Agricultural (RA) to
Industrial-1 (I-1) and Industrial-2 (I-2). The
application is being filed along with a Category 17 Special
Permit for an existing contractor’s office, shop and
material storage yard.
The County
has entered into a three party agreement with the Rodgers
Family Limited Partnership and the Fauquier County Fair
Board to acquire approximately 4.5 acres of the Rodgers
property for the Central Sports Complex and to lease
approximately 6 acres of the sports complex property to the
Fair Board for parking and other fair-related purposes. As
part of the agreement, the County agreed to initiate a
rezoning request for the remaining portion of the Rodgers
property to an industrial/employment classification, with
proffers related to buffering and limitations on uses
allowed, among other items.
Background:
Approximately five years ago, the Board of Supervisors
acquired 70 acres of a larger 130-acre tract, with frontage
along Meetze Road (Route 643) and Old Auburn Road (Route
670), from the Rodgers Family Limited Partnership for the
development of a sporting and recreational complex to serve
the citizens in the central portion of Fauquier County. The
property adjoins the Fauquier County Fairgrounds.
Subsequently, the Fauquier County Fair Board sought to lease
a portion of the new Central Sports Complex property for
parking and other fair-related activities. In order to
accommodate the needs of the Fairgrounds and to provide for
the recreational needs of the community, additional acreage
is needed for the park to offset the land leased to the Fair
Board. In February 2007, the Board of Supervisors
authorized the execution of an agreement to acquire
additional property from the Rodgers property adjoining the
Central Sports Complex and to lease property to the Fair
Board.
Rezoning:
On May 10,
2007 the Fauquier County Board of Supervisors passed a
Resolution to initiate a rezoning application for the
Rodgers Family Limited Partnership property (P.I.N.
6993-07-7710-000).
The property
to the north of the southern boundary of the power line
easement (44.35 acres) is proposed for I-1, Industrial Park,
and the area to the south of the power line easement (11.20
acres), where Piedmont Contracting and Moriah Farm
facilities are located, is proposed for I-2, General
Industrial zoning. As is evident in the proffers, all heavy
industrial uses, as defined in 5-1703.1 of the Zoning
Ordinance have been proffered out in addition to other uses
not suitable in this area.
With a
rezoning application, conformance with the Comprehensive
Plan is extremely important. The Warrenton Service District
Plan has two major references to this property:
-
Campus/employment designation – employment uses are
recommended in a campus-like setting. As the larger
I-1 parcel is developed, employment opportunities
will become available. The owners have proffered
the future submission of a coordinated development
plan as well as an overall architectural theme for
the future buildings. In accord with Section 2-39
(3) (G) of the Fauquier County Subdivision
Ordinance, this “Plan of Development” for industrial
property will then allow the general subdivision of
lots for sale or future development.
-
Highway Corridor Overlay – Meetze Road is one of the
major entries into Warrenton and is designated in
the Plan as a gateway. The Comprehensive Plan
encourages any new construction to exhibit the
traditional agrarian characteristics of the Piedmont
area, such as having the appearance and scale of
traditional farmhouses, barns and other farm
buildings. Street landscaping is to blend in with
its neighbors and hide wide expanses of parking and
pavement. To the extent practical, parking should
be to the side or rear of new structures and will
not intrude visually on the fronting road. The
owners have proffered conditions consistent with
these Plan recommendations.
In addition,
enhanced buffering along the Old Auburn Road frontage is
proposed as illustrated on Sheet 6 of the accompanying
rezoning plats.
Special
Permit:
Piedmont
Contracting is a full-service site development and utility
contractor, specializing in estimating, earthmoving,
clearing, site utilities and concrete work. Additionally,
Piedmont Contracting provides services to many agricultural
and farming operations in the region, and works on both
large and small projects. The current number of employees,
both on-site and in the field, varies between 25 and 70.
About 10 employees are on-site, including office personnel
and mechanics. Piedmont has a current inventory of
approximately 20 pieces of off-road heavy equipment and 8
highway vehicles (pick-ups and heavy trucks). There is
minimal outdoor storage and the only time heavy equipment is
located on site would be for repairs, pick-up and delivery.
All repair work is performed within the existing shop
building.
Currently
the 11.2-acre portion of the property is the site of the
Moriah Farm farming operation and the location of the
contractor’s office/shop and material storage yard. The
office building is shared by both Moriah Farm and Piedmont
Contracting. The contracting operation occupies only one
additional structure on the property, shown as Piedmont
shop/repair on the Special Permit Plat. The remaining
structures are currently used by, and will continue to be
used by, Moriah Farm. All of the existing structures
on-site were constructed as agriculture buildings for the
use of the farming operations and have been determined as
agriculture related structures exempting them from building
code requirements permits and inspections. All structures
to be used for the farm operations will remain with no
proposed changes. All structures being used for the
contractor’s office and shop/repair will secure proper
permits, inspections and a certificate of occupancy through
the Building Office, meeting the building code
requirements. Following Special Permit approval, a Minor
Site Plan will be submitted meeting all ordinance
provisions. The entrance along Meetze Road is shown as
the current entrance with no proposed changes. A proffer
has been provided that requires the owner to work with
Fauquier County and VDOT on a shared entrance with the
Central Sports Complex, along Meetze Road, if determined
necessary by VDOT for safety reasons. If this occurs, then
at the time such shared entrance and associated road
improvements on Meetze Road are complete and operational,
the owner shall abandon its existing entrance. As the
entrance to the Central Sports Complex is designed, the
staff will need to work with VDOT to ensure the use of
recreational grant funds for a shared entrance.
|
|
Staff
Analysis:
Staff and
the appropriate referral agencies have reviewed this request
for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Zoning
Ordinance, and other relevant policies and regulations and
have the following comments:
Zoning
Office:
An analysis of the General Standards
for a Special Permit Request is outlined below. With the
conditions noted herein, this Special Permit request
complies with the general standards.
|
Code Section |
Standard |
Review |
|
General Standards |
|
5-006.1 |
The proposed use shall be such that it will not
adversely affect the use or development of
neighboring properties. It shall be in accordance
with the applicable zoning district regulations and
the applicable provisions of the adopted
Comprehensive Plan. The location, size and height
of buildings, structures, walls and fences, and the
nature and extent of screening, buffering and
landscaping shall be such that the use will not
hinder or discourage the appropriate development
and/or use of adjacent or nearby land and/or
buildings or impair the value thereof. |
The Special Permit
is sought for the purpose of bringing an existing
illegal
contractor office, shop, and material storage yard
into compliance with the Zoning Ordinance.
No new facilities are proposed. The property is
described as industrial in the comprehensive plan.
|
|
5-006.2 |
The proposed use shall be such that pedestrian and
vehicular traffic generated will not be hazardous or
conflict with the existing and anticipated traffic
in the neighborhood and on the streets serving the
site. |
This is not a
pedestrian oriented use. The existing vehicular
entrance will be used until such time as it is
vacated for a shared entrance with the adjacent
Central Sports Complex. |
|
5-006.3 |
In addition to the standards which may be set forth
in this Article for a particular category or use,
the Board may require landscaping, screening, yard
requirements or other limitations found to be
necessary and appropriate to the proposed use and
location. |
Existing trees
provide a significant buffer adjacent to the county
park parcel |
|
5-006.4 |
Open space shall be provided in an amount at least
equal to that specified for the zoning district in
which the proposed use is located. |
No open space is
required. |
|
5-006.5 |
Adequate utility, drainage, parking, loading and
other necessary facilities to serve the proposed use
shall be provided. Parking and loading requirements
shall be in accordance with the provisions of
Article 7. |
The Applicant
acknowledges that all utilities, drainage, parking,
loading and other necessary facilities to serve the
use shall be provided in accordance with the
ordinance. These issues can be addressed in detail
on the Site Plan.
|
|
5-006.6 |
Signs shall be regulated by the provisions of
Article 8, except as may be qualified in the Parts
that follow for a particular category or use.
However, the BZA and the Board, under the authority
presented in Section 007 below, may impose more
strict standards for a given use than those set
forth in this Ordinance. |
Signs are not
addressed in the application. All signs must meet
Zoning Ordinance requirements and receive proper
permits.
|
|
5-006.7 |
The future impact of a proposed use will be
considered and addressed in establishing a time
limit on the permit, if deemed appropriate.
Existing and recent development, current zoning and
the Comprehensive Plan shall be among the factors
used in assessing the future impact of the proposed
use and whether reconsideration of the permit after
a stated period of time would be necessary and
appropriate for the protection of properties in the
vicinity and to ensure implementation of the
Comprehensive Plan. |
The long-term plans
for this immediate area are industrial. |
|
5-006.8 |
The proposed use shall be such that air quality,
surface and groundwater quality and quantity, are
not degraded or depleted to an extent that would
hinder or discourage the appropriate development
and/or use of adjacent or nearby land and/or
buildings or impair the value thereof. |
There is an area of
floodplain at the southern corner of the property.
No structures or activity is shown in the floodplain
area. During the Site Plan process, Stormwater/BMP
issues will be addressed if required. |
|
5-006.9 |
Except as provided in this Article, all uses shall
comply with the lot size, bulk regulations, and
performance standards of the zoning district in
which located. |
The existing one
story office building will be within the 75’ side
setback abutting the county park parcel. The
building will be significantly screened from the
county parcel. |
Engineering Office:
The
Engineering Office worked directly with the applicant’s
engineer and has received a revised plan addressing the
comments below.
- On
sheet 8, Area A4 designates a regional pond with 65%
credit for phosphorus removal. This is not a regional
pond so the removal rate has to be revised to 50%. The
soils map on sheet 3 indicates that the pond in area A1
is located in an area this is characterized as having a
high water table and therefore this is not suitable for
a dry pond as is designated. This pond should be
converted to an enhanced extended detention pond. This
designation will allow the removal rate for this sub
area to be raised to 50%. When you revise both of these
sub areas in Part 3 of the BMP calculations you are
still under the 40% minimum removal rate that is
required for the site. One way to fix this is to shift
the pond in area A3 downhill a little bit and increase
the drainage area to at least 11.3ac.
- An
area near the entrance is designated as possible
wetlands. Wetlands are required to be shown with
rezoning applications. Furthermore, the Central Sports
Complex site shows much more extensive wetlands in this
area that appear to extend into the Rodgers property.
Provide the source of the wetland information shown.
- If
additional right-of-way dedication is required for
Meetze Road the pond in area A4 will have to be shifted
so the toe of slope of the pond embankment is at least
25 feet away from the right-of-way. If additional
right-of-way is required for Old Auburn the same setback
will apply.
Soil
Scientist’s Office:
Based on the
Official Fauquier County Soil Survey, the 60 acre site has
the following ratings for development using conventional
drainfields:
-
57% is rated GOOD (53C, 45C)
-
12% is rated MARGINAL (40C, 47C)
-
13% is rated POOR (48B)
-
18% is rated NOT SUITED (10A, 16B)
Areas rated
MARGINAL to NOT SUITED are due to issues with depth to
bedrock (40C), depth to water table (10A, 16B, 48B),
landscape position (10A, 16B, 48B) and shrink-swell
potential (48B). Map units 10A and 16B may contain hydric
soil inclusions, meaning that these are areas that may
contain jurisdictional wetlands. The site also contains
soils that are classified as “Prime Farmland” (13% of the
site), with an additional 62% of the soils being classified
as “Statewide Important.” There is about 0.5 acres of
floodplain in the southern tip of the tract.
Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT):
In their comments, VDOT requested a Traffic Impact Analysis
prior to the rezoning of the 44.35 acres proposed for
Industrial (I-1) zoning. VDOT has stated they have no
objection to the Rezoning and Special Permit requests for
the 11.2 acres which is the current location of Piedmont
Contracting.
In December, 2006, VDOT’s central offices located in
Richmond adopted state-wide “Traffic Impact Analysis
Regulations Administrative Guidelines.” These regulations
outline when a Traffic Impact Analysis is required as part
of a development proposal. VDOT’s requirements went into
effect July 1, 2007, but are being phased by the various
Districts. Culpeper District, which includes Fauquier
County, does not start implementing these requirements until
January, 2008. Based on this timing and the fact that
development is being postponed for several years,
necessitating the need for an updated plan at that time,
staff does not feel a Traffic Impact Analysis is pertinent
at this stage.
Submission of a Traffic Impact Analysis has been proffered
with the submission of the first site plan for the I-1
parcel. The following comments received from VDOT will be
addressed during the site plan process:
1.
Plans need to indicate existing right-of-way width on
Routes 670 and 643, and right-of-way dedication a minimum of
25 feet from centerline.
2.
Vehicle trips per day need to be provided for both
existing and proposed uses.
3.
A traffic impact analysis and master plan should be
provided prior to the rezoning to determine any impacts.
The proffers are indicating providing a TIA with the first
site plan, but at that time the zoning has already been
approved.
4.
Concerns were raised during the planning of the
Central Park about the impact of traffic on Route 670 which
led to the entrance being proposed on Route 643. The Moriah
Farm rezoning is indicating two entrances on Route 670, but
no documentation has been provided for the traffic
generation.
5.
The latest plan on file for the Central Park does not
show the location of the existing entrance to the Moriah
Farm, but it appears that there is minimal separation
between the entrances.
6.
Illustrate the needed road improvements for the
Central Park on the plan in order to evaluate any potential
conflict, and demonstrate any right-of-way needed for those
improvements.
7.
There appears to be an access easement proposed from
the Moriah Farm over to the road into the Central Park. The
main road into the Central Park is proposed to be
constructed as a recreational access road project through
VDOT, and access to this road from an industrial use could
affect the status of that project. The recreational access
guide
indicates that the alignment for recreational access roads
should avoid allowing access to residential or commercial
development. A reduced street width is allowed for
recreational access roads because of the low volume and type
of vehicles that will be utilizing the road, and the
introduction of large construction equipment to this traffic
could create a safety problem.
8.
VDOT has no objection to the rezoning of the 11.20
acres of the farm that it is the existing Piedmont
Contracting offices in order to provide zoning consistent
with the current use.
Summary and Recommendations:
If the Board
of Supervisors wishes to approve Rezoning REZN07-CT-008 and
Special Permit SPPT07-CT-031, staff has prepared conditions
for the Special Permit request:
- The
use must be in general conformance with the Special
Permit Plat (Sheet 5) dated May 17, 2007.
- The
contractor storage operation shall be limited to the
shop building and shared use of the office building
(with farm operation).
- All
repair work shall be performed within the existing shop
building.
-
Outdoor storage shall be limited to equipment and
vehicles only, with the area for storage clearly
identified on the site plan and screening provided if
storage is visible from the street or park property. No
more than 20 pieces of equipment shall be stored on-site
with no more than 8 highway vehicles parked on-site.
- The
existing trees areas abutting the county park parcel
must be located within a tree preservation easement
within one year of approval of the Special Permit
application to ensure their existence and maintain the
existing buffer.
- All
signs must meet Zoning Ordinance requirements and
receive proper permits. Any unpermitted signs shall be
removed.
-
Building permits shall be secured for the shop and
office building within one year of approval of this
special permit.
- Site
plan approval is required for the portion of the site
occupied by the existing use within one year of approval
of this special use permit.
|