|
Staff
Analysis
Staff and the appropriate referral agencies have reviewed
this request for conformance with the Comprehensive Plan,
the Zoning Ordinance, and other relevant policies and
regulations. The majority of referral agencies had no
issues with the proposed use of this existing facility.
Findings, comments, and recommendations are summarized
below. The actual responses from referral agencies are
available upon request. Following each comment, in italics,
is the note to clarify how each comment has been addressed.
Soil Scientist
Reviewing
the Fauquier County Soil Survey, the site is mainly made up
of two soil map units, 25C and 25D. The map units can have
rock outcrops, steep slopes (15- 25%), and the bedrock tends
to be shallow which may require blasting to achieve the
desired grade. Due to these site constraints it is rated
marginal to poor for development using conventional septic
tanks and drainfields.
(Informational comment.)
Zoning Office
1.
It remains unclear whether the approximately 300
student enrollment will remain stable or whether new
enrollment will be increased upon completion of the new
building. It appears that, since the new building is
anticipated to hold an additional 100 students, based on
previously submitted information, that enrollment could
increase to approximately 400 students.
(Enrollment now subject to a condition.)
2.
It is still unclear whether the usable recreation
area available meets the requirements of Zoning Ordinance
Section 5-504.1. The current submission does not address
this issue.
(Recreation area now subject to a condition with details to
be shown on Site Plan.)
3.
Staff notes that several elements included in the
plans in 1982, 1987, and/or 1996 are missing from this
submission. Therefore, the use may be in violation of
previous approval conditions. The drawings must accurately
reflect what is currently on-site and what is proposed.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
4.
The Special Exception Site Layout Plan shows the
approximately 9,000 square foot recreation area previously
shown for grades 1 through 3 but no information is given
regarding the number of students in the 1st to 3rd
grade category.
(Recreation area now subject to a condition.)
5.
The recreation areas previously shown on the 1982,
1987, and/or the 1996 plan sheets do not show up on any of
the three sheets associated with the June, 2007 drawings.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
6.
Landscaping shown on the 1982, 1987, and/or the 1996
plan sheets is not clearly reflected in the latest drawings.
If the landscaping is not installed, then the use is in
violation of the conditions of previous approvals.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
7.
Since existing parking spaces are not delineated on
the Existing Conditions Plan, it is unclear how many parking
spaces are being added or reorganized. Please clarify.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
8.
All requirements of the zoning ordinance must be
addressed in the Statement of Intent and on the Special
Exception Plan.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
9.
A new Major Site Plan is required per Zoning
Ordinance Sections 3-305.2, 3-305.3, 12-201 and 12-500 for
the uses since new physical changes to the property are
proposed that will require 10,000 square feet or more of
land disturbance.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
Engineering
The
Engineering Department has reviewed the reference plan.
Based on the information received, the department has the
following comments:
1.
Ensure the Site Plan conforms to the Zoning
Ordinance.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
2.
Provide information to determine if there are
jurisdictional wetlands on site.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
3.
LID stormwater measures may be very appropriate for
this very tight and steep site. Please consider LID as, at
least, a partial solution to the stormwater management
problem.
(Recommendation.)
4.
The concept grading plan indicates most of the area
to be disturbed by the project will drain to the existing
pond and receiving stream. State stormwater management
regulations require treatment of stormwater as well as
erosion and sedimentation control.
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
5.
Consider the impact that the increased student
enrollment capability will have on traffic within the site
as well as at entrances onto public highways.
(Considered as part of the overall application.)
6.
Consider the impact that increased enrollment will
have on existing water supply and fire protection systems.
(Subject to a condition.)
7.
Evaluate on-site soil types in view of steep slopes
and erosion potential
(To be
shown on Site Plan.)
VDOT
The Warrenton Residency staff reviewed the above referenced
special exception dated July 31, 2007. The trip generation
rates provided do not appear to be from the current edition
of the ITE Manual which indicates 822 trips for a Private
School with 50 employees. This generates a 150 foot taper,
but it appears the existing 75 foot deceleration and 75 foot
taper are adequate.
(VDOT is satisfied with the existing
entrance and property frontage conditions.)
Issues Identified by Members of
the Public
Members of
the public have contacted staff and county officials
(in-person, by telephone, and e-mail) to express both
support and opposition for this application. A number of
concerns have been raised and are included below. Most of
these concerns were expressed at the Planning Commission
public hearing.
Some
adjacent property owners have indicated that they are not in
any way opposed to Fresta
Valley
Christian
School,
but that it is not a good idea for the school to be located
at this particular site on Wilson Road. Further they have
indicated that Wilson Road
is a
dangerous road due to its long and winding configuration and
amount of traffic (including motorcycles and bicycles).
Neighbors also voiced concern about congestion at the
Fresta
Valley entrance and speeding
vehicles running late to school and have suggested that
Fauquier
County consider requesting further
study of the traffic situation that currently exists on
Wilson Road before adding more
vehicles to what they say is an already unsafe situation.
Summary
and Recommendations:
All review
agency comments have been dealt with by conditions or will
be addressed at Site Plan. The Planning Commission
recommended that the Board of Supervisors approve this
application with 30 conditions. (These are included in the
resolution.) The conditions, among other things, limit the
number of students to 400, number of employees, and hours of
operation. These conditions restrict the development so
that it will not adversely affect neighboring properties
|