|
AGENDA
REQUEST Owner/Applicant
Board of Supervisors Meeting Date: Farzin Sadeghi
Staff Lead:
Department: Chuck A. Floyd, Senior Planner Community Development Magisterial
District:
PIN: Topic: A
Resolution Denying WAVR04-MA-001: A Waiver of Zoning Ordinance Section
7-302.1.C to Allow a Private Street (Valley Dale Lane) That is Forty (40)
Feet in Width, Instead of the Required Minimum of Fifty (50) Feet, Farzin
Sadeghi, Owner/Applicant Topic Description: The
applicant is seeking a waiver of Zoning Ordinance Section 7-302.1.C,
Limitations, which would allow a subdivision on a private street that is
not fifty (50) feet in width. The applicant has submitted an
Administrative Subdivision application to divide a 52.52 acre parcel into
two lots, to create a 4.07 acre parcel for his sister.
As proposed, the Administrative Division occurs ±1,600
feet on The subject property is
located on the north side of Requested Action of the
Board of Supervisors: Consider adoption of the
attached
resolution.
Other Departments,
Organizations or Individuals affected by this request: Property owners along Planning Commission
Action: On Staff Analysis: Section 7-302.1.C of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a private street have a minimum width of fifty (50) feet. However, the Board of Supervisors has the authority to modify this limitation provided the applicant can show that: 1. No other remedy is realistically feasible; 2. Plausible alternatives have been exhausted; 3. To not so modify the applicable limitation would place an unreasonable restriction on the use of the property; and 4. Properties through which access is planned will not be unreasonably affected. No other
access options are available, as the applicant’s lot is internal to the
adjoining development. Without
the requested waiver, the applicant cannot proceed with the proposed
Administrative Subdivision, as the road frontage and access requirements
cannot be met. Research of
County records show that Twelve (12) addressable
structures, presumably homes, are located on The adjoining property
owners do not concur with staff in the opinion that one additional house
will not have an impact on the properties through which the access is
planned. Additional research
by staff has indicated that at least two (2) houses, owned by Brian
Santucci and Henry Haynes, will be greatly affected by this request.
Both houses on these properties are located within close proximity
to the exiting roadway. Any
new construction utilizing On Staff
conducted meetings with some of the adjoining property owners on a couple
of occasions. Attachment 3 is
letters from these neighbors. Some
of their major concerns are: sight
distance at the entrance of 1.
Applicant’s
Statement of Justification 2.
Deed of Easement for
Thorpe Property 3.
Adjoining Property
Owners’ Comments |