|
Topic Description:
The
applicant wishes to obtain Special Exception approval under
Category 26, which would allow for a decrease in the
non-common open space requirement. If approved, this
Special Exception would allow subdivision of the parcel into
two (2) lots.
The
Planning Commission held a public hearing for this request
on September 29, 2005, and forwarded to the Board of
Supervisors on October 27, 2005 with a recommendation of
approval.
Project
Information:
This
proposal would allow for one non-common open space lot of
25.4812 acres and one 2-acre lot. The property does have
the subdivision potential for up to two (2) lots. However,
no subdivision can currently be allowed since the overall
parcel is already below the required 85% non-common open
space. Thus, the need for this application.
The
existing totals 27.482 acres. In 1986, the “parent parcel”
was 40 acres in size. The subdivision potential uses the
1986 acreage to calculate the 85%; this would be equivalent
to 34 acres. Due to a family transfer and a boundary line
adjustment in 1988, the residual property was reduced in
size to 27.482 acres. Hence, the need for the non-common
open space reduction, which would reduce the 85% minimum to
63.4% (25.48 acres) of non-common open space, pursuant to
Section 3-326 and the standards set forth in Section 5-206
of the Zoning Ordinance.
It should
be noted that, in general, non-common open space parcels
(residue lots) are deed restricted from further
subdivision. This restriction is highlighted since the
applicant has inquired as to the possibility of future land
transfers for children. In this particular case, the
25.48-acre residue would be the non-common open space and
therefore, not divisible in the future. However, it could
support a family dwelling unit, if Zoning Ordinance
requirements are met, along with the existing house on the
site. The applicant needs to be aware that with the
proposed conditions the residue could not be further
divided.
The proposed reduction is allowed by the standards in 5-2601
upon a determination that: “the required amount is not
necessary in order to protect the scenic, natural or
historic resources contained on the site, in which case the
open space may be reduced to that amount necessary.”
The
applicant has provided a chronology of hardships over the
past two (2) decades that have contributed to the need for
this request. In particular, the Statement of Justification
notes that the potential sale of the 2-acre lot would
provide for continued financial support for the owners’
elderly mothers who are both in poor health. In addition,
the owners are planning for their retirement and will need
additional income to augment living expenses.
|