|
CONSENT
AGENDA REQUEST
|
|
Sponsor:
|
Meeting
Date:
|
|
Harry Atherton,
Marshall
District
Larry Weeks,
Scott
District
|
December 16, 2002
|
|
Staff Lead:
|
Department:
|
| Elizabeth Cook, Chief of Planning
|
Community Development
|
|
Topic:
RESOLUTION FOR THE
LAKE DRIVE
ALTERNATIVE SELECTION PURSUANT TO THE
BROOKSIDE
FARM PROFFER STATEMENT, ITEM C.2 |
Topic
Description:
The
proposed resolution recommends the preferred option for the
Lake
Drive
extension connecting streets from the Brookside Farm development.
A companion consent agenda item for
Lake
Drive
presents
traffic calming recommendations for VDOT implementation.
|
|
Background
Information:
|
|
Brookside Farm
(formerly known as the Waterfield project) and
Brookside
(R.G Holdings and other properties to the south of Waterfield)
were part of a series of interrelated comprehensive plan
amendment, rezoning amendment, special exception and preliminary
subdivision applications. On
May 20, 2002
, the Board of Supervisors approved that series of applications.
There was one issue from those applications still
remaining for Board of Supervisors’ consideration and action,
with recommendations from the Transportation Committee.
That issue dealt with the
Lake
Drive
extension to the proposed
Brookside Parkway
,
including the degree to which Brookside Farm neighborhood street
connections to
Lake
Drive
would be
allowed.
The staff, in consultation with VDOT, identified
five options for Transportation Committee consideration.
These were also presented to the affected neighborhoods
within the
Lake
Drive
area.
The preferred alternative is attached and identified as
Lake Drive Alternatives Option 1.
The
Lake
Drive
extension is not allowed to connect to the
Brookside Parkway
.
The Brookside Farm streets, opposite the
Mallard
Court
and
Wintergreen
Court
intersections with
Lake
Drive
, are
restricted in their length and are precluded from having any
bridge crossing access to the south to the balance of that new
residential development.
This
selected alternative was recommended unanimously by the
Transportation Committee at its meeting on
December 3, 2002
. Action needs to be
taken due to the provisions of the approved Brookside Farm
Proffers (Item C.2, pp. 9-10), which state:
“Final
decision as to the minimization of traffic on
Lake Drive
shall be
made prior to the final construction plan/final plat stage.
Options for minimization shall include but not be limited
to the following options: eliminating
the wetlands/bridge crossings which result in neighborhood street
connections to
Lake
Drive
, four
way stops and other traffic calming measures.
Final minimization decisions shall be made by the Board of
Supervisors, within a specific request by the Applicant for such a
decision. If the Board
fails to act within a 45-day period, then the approval of these
proffers shall govern. Any
changes mandated by the Board shall not operate to effectively
isolate one portion of the entire project from the others (i.e.
all through streets from
Lake
Drive
cannot
be cul-de-saced) and shall not be considered a substantial
deviation from the Concept Development Plan requiring
amendment.”
|
|
Requested
Action of the Board of Supervisors:
Consider
adoption of attached resolution.
|
|
Financial Impacts Analysis:
|
|
None
Required.
|
|
Identify any
other Departments, Organizations or Individuals that would be
affected by this request:
VDOT
Brookside
Farm
|
Attachments
Board of Supervisors Resolution
Map:
Lake Drive
Alternatives, Option 1
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION
FOR THE
LAKE DRIVE
ALTERNATIVE SELECTION PURSUANT TO THE
BROOKSIDE
FARM PROFFER STATEMENT, ITEM C.2
WHEREAS, in May 2002, the Brookside Farm
Planned Residential Development (PRD) was approved; and
WHEREAS, the Brookside Farm Proffer Statement (C.1.2) allowed the
final decision for Lake Drive extension and project interconnections to be
made at or prior to the final construction plan/final plat stage; and
WHEREAS, those options shall include eliminating the wetland/bridge
crossings; and
WHEREAS, the Brookside Farm developer and the Board of Supervisors
agreed the selected option shall not effectively isolate one portion of
the “Entire Project” from the others; and
WHEREAS, based on the Transportation Committee assessment of
Lake Drive
alternatives and traffic calming recommendations; now, therefore, be it
RESOLVED by the Fauquier County Board of Supervisors this 16th day
of December 2002, That Option 1 has been selected as the design
alternative for the developer of Brookside Farm to complete regarding
access to and the extension of Lake Drive; and be it
RESOLVED FURTHER, That the following be accomplished:
·
Post Development Posted Speed Limit Signs.
VDOT is requested to retain and/or place, at a minimum, posted
speed limit signs for 25 mph or less along
Lake Drive
from its intersection with
Riley Road
to
Wintergreen Court
and the planned extension of
Lake Drive
. Placement will be based on a
VDOT engineering study prior to removing the posted and temporary speed
limit signs placed during the construction phase;
·
Lake Drive
&
Riley Road
Intersection. When
this Brookside Farm phase along
Lake Drive
is initiated, staff is directed to schedule, in conjunction with VDOT, the
construction timing of a left turn lane for southbound traffic on
Riley Road
wanting to turn into
Lake Drive
. It is noted that this turn
lane and any essential line of sight of sight improvements can be
completed within the existing right-of-way.
These improvements can be funded through the transportation
proffers for the Brookside Farm project.
Completion of this overall intersection improvement can be done
either through VDOT or the developer, whichever option is more cost
effective at the time the improvement is required;
·
Construction Phase.
The County and VDOT will work diligently with the developer to
limit construction traffic exposure to
Lake Drive
area residents. (Please note that precluding the direct Lake Drive
connection to the Vint Hill/Brookside Parkway, and disconnecting the
Brookside Farm streets, which are aligned opposite Mallard and Wintergreen
Courts, from direct access to the south, results in constraining
construction truck traffic access solutions.
Lake Drive
will now have some of that traffic which has no other way of ingress or
egress.)
·
Construction Access. The County and VDOT shall work
with the Vint Hill EDA and the Developer to implement a controlled access
program. For example, such a
program would result in construction traffic and vehicles with heavy
loads, for the residential phase being developed along Lake Drive
locations, to access via the Vint Hill/Brookside Parkway and Rt. 793 (Vint
Hill west gate), or from other practical directions.
·
Lake Drive
Resurfacing. Request
VDOT to require a
Lake Drive
bond and/or obtain an agreement from the developer that will result in
resurfacing
Lake Drive
and fixing any damage resulting from the residential development.
|